|
今天翻前两天刚送到的《C专家编程》,章节8.10的那个IOCCC 1987年的获奖作品让我觉得很好玩。
- main(){ printf(&unix["/021%six/012/0"], (unix)["have"] + "fun" - 0x60);}
复制代码
作者这里利用的第一个技巧并不算太晦涩:"a = i[a]= *(a+i)“ 即下标运算符的可交换性。
但是这个老天爷的unix和&unix是怎么回事?
我把自己脑子里有印象的C的最隐蔽的角落回想了一遍,难道是trigraph之类的特殊符号?查了查不是
正推不行,就反推吧。编译运行后,输出结果是“unix“。如此说来“(unix)["have"] + "fun" - 0x60)“这个表达式的结果应该是指向"un"的char * ;因此,“(unix)["have"] - 0x60"的值应该是整数1才对;因此“(unix)["have"]"的值应该是0x61;这就豁然开朗了,0x61='a',是"have"中的第二个字符,所以unix的值必然为1。
这个反推是否正确呢? 利用gcc看一下只进行preprocessor处理后的代码:
- whodare@whodare:~/programming/c++$ gcc -E 1.c
- main()
- {
- printf(&1["/021%six/012/0"], (1)["have"] + "fun" - 0x60) ;
- }
复制代码
正确。unix看来是属于预定义的marco,值为1。拿“gcc predefined marco"为关键字google了一下,找到可信资料了: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/System_002dspecific-Predefined-Macros.html#System_002dspecific-Predefined-Macros
原来unix这个宏是属于gcc提供的 System-specific Predefined Macros,因此这个奇妙的函数只能在*nix环境下正常工作。
可以查看更多的gcc提供的predefined marco 顺便附上历史文献,哈哈
- Best One Liner:
- David Korn
- AT&T Bell Labs
- MH 3C-526B, AT&T Bell Labs
- Murray Hill, NJ
- 07974
- USA
- The Judges believe that this is the best one line entry ever received.
- Compile on a UN*X system, or at least using a C implementation that
- fakes it. Very few people are able to determine what this program
- does by visual inspection. I suggest that you stop reading this
- section right now and see if you are one of the few people who can.
- Several points are important to understand in this program:
- 1) What is the symbol `unix' and what is its value in the program?
- Clearly `unix' is not a function, and since `unix' is not declared
- to be a data type (such as int, char, struct foo, enum, ...)
- what must `unix' be?
- 2) What is the value of the symbol "have"? (hint: the value is
- NOT 4 characters, or 'h', or a string) Consider the fact that:
- char *x;
- defines a pointer to a character (i.e. an address), and that
- the `=' assigns things is compatible types. Since:
- x = "have";
- is legal C, what type of value is "have"?
- 3) Note that the following expressions yield the same value:
- (unix)["have"] + "fun" - 0x60)
- x[3] *(x+3) *(3+x)
- since addition is communitive. What can be said about the value:
- 3[x]
复制代码
|